Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Author: ywpk

August undefined, 2024

WebFeb 5, 2015 · Learned Advocate for the petitioner has relied upon the decision rendered by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat and another reported in 2001 (3) GLR 2024, and submitted that in the said case, the Honourable Supreme Court has given a direction to the trial Court to make a note of … WebSep 22, 2008 · "Bipin Shantilal Panchal, V/s State of Gujarat" 4 (2001) 3 SCC 1 is no...opinion 4 {5} wp4788-14 that the view in Bipin Panchal should not be considered as …

Bipin Shantilal Panchal v/s State of Gujarat - LawyerServices

WebAug 5, 2024 · Also supported by Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat (3 judges bench) 2001 (3) SCC 1, where it was noted : ... Step by Step procedure of impounding : (as gleaned from Chilakuri Gangulappa v. RDO, Madanpalle and Ors) 2001 (4) SCC 197 and provisions of Section 33 of the Stamp Act) : WebRespondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing of a further huge quantity of Mandrex tablets which, added with the earlier interception, is quantified at about 2000 Kgs. easyeschool download

Validity of Under-Stamped or Non-Stamped …

WebSep 7, 1998 · Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1...that even the Law Commission in its 157th report did not recommend any change in law of evidence. … WebApr 20, 2024 · It was pointed out by learned amici that the practice adopted predominantly in all trials is guided by the decision of this court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat 4 with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses. WebAug 14, 2024 · However, it was observed by the Supreme Court in 2001 in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat , AIR 2001 SC 1158, that that ‘it is an archaic practice that during the evidence collecting stage, whenever any objection is raised regarding admissibility of any material in evidence the court does not proceed further without … curd philippines

Jayeshbhai Shankarbhai Patel v. State Of Gujarat Gujarat High …

BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL VS STATE - LawCanvas

WebIn the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, practices with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses were enunciated and it was directed that the Court must record answers to all questions, regardless of objections. However, this may lead to prolonged and lengthy cross examination, and more ... WebJul 28, 2024 · Before issuing the Draft Rules, the Supreme Court in the present case analyzed the view taken by the Court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, with regards to the process of cross-examination methods and objections related to the deposition of witnesses. easyeschool appWebOct 1, 2024 · The judgment of the Supreme Court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, observes as under: ... This is a consistent position, as held by the Supreme Court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal (supra). Insofar as the second category of documents are concerned, the Bombay High Court has held that such objections have to … curd processing

"" - Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

Bipin shantilal panchal v state of gujarat

bipin+shantilal+panchal Indian Case Law Law CaseMine

WebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing … WebAug 6, 2015 · The trial court after considering the submissions advanced by the learned advocates for the respective parties, was of the view that when an objection has been raised to exhibiting the document, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, 2001 (2) GLH 545, the question as regards the ...

Did you know?

WebGujarat High Court Judgename :C.K.BUCH BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL - Appellant Versus STATE - Respondent CRI.M.A. 6523 of 2000 Decided On : 05/01/2001 … WebApr 21, 2024 · It was pointed out by learned amici that the practice adopted predominantly in all trials is guided by the decision of this court in Bipin Shantilal Panchal v.State of Gujarat (2001) 3 SCC 1 with respect to objections regarding questions to be put to witnesses. This court had termed the practice of deciding the objections, immediately as …

WebMay 1, 2001 · As the petitioner Bipin Panchal had approached the Apex Court against the order passed by this Court, he has agitated bail plea again before this Court and … WebSep 7, 1998 · BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in (2001) 3 S.C.C. 1, wherein it is held as follows: " When so recast, the practice which can be a better substitute...of oral evidence." 5. 5. Applying the above ratio laid down by the Apex Court in BIPIN SHANTILAL PANCHAL V. STATE OF GUJARAT reported in (2001) 3 S.C.C. 1, …

WebMay 20, 2024 · The Amici Curiae pointed that the practice of recording answers to all questions regardless of objections to the questions, as was directed in matter titled as … WebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing of a further huge quantity of Mandrex tablets which, added with the earlier interception, is quantified at about 2000 Kgs. The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ahmedabad filed …

WebNov 3, 2001 · The state of gujarat reported in 1997 (1) glh 799 and submitted that lie detection test is a scientific test and expert be allowed to depose and if any objection is raised, the same can be finalised as directed by the supreme court in bipin shantilal panchal's case (supra).

Web1996(1) Supreme 279 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA A.M. Ahmadi, CJI, B.P. Jeevan Reddy & N.P. Singh, JJ. Dr. Bipin Shantilal Panchal -Appellant versus State of Gujarat … curd processing flow chartWebApr 27, 2024 · State of Gujarat [Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 417] , deprecated the practice in respect of the admissibility of any material evidence, where the Court does not proceed further without passing order on such objection. It was held that all objections raised shall be decided by the Court at the ... easy esWebPratapbhai Hamirbhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat and Another .... 561 Public Union for Civil Liberties v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. .... 579 Purushottam Das Bangur & Ors. v. Dayanand ... Bipin Shantilal Panchal (Dr.) v. State of Gujarat 1996 (1) SCR 193 – distinguished .... 837 Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India & Ors. (Brig Mohan Lal-I) 2002 ... easyesefWebJan 8, 1996 · Dr. Bipin Shantilal Panchal Vs. State of Gujrat [1996] INSC 28 (8 January 1996) Singh N.P. (J) Singh N.P. (J) Ahmadi A.M. (Cj) Jeevan Reddy, B.P. (J) N.P. Singh, … easy errorsWebAug 14, 2006 · Looking to the facts of the present case, documents were already exhibited vide order dated 20th may, 2006 by the learned metropolitan magistrate and as per the decision rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of bipin shantilal panchal v/s. State of gujarat and another reported in (2001) 3 scc, 1, the revision application filed by ... easy esfWebFeb 22, 2001 · Respondent (Dr. Bipin S. Panchal) was arrested on 8.11.1993 in connection with the aforesaid seizure of narcotic or psychotropic substance. It led to the unearthing … easyeschool onlineWebOct 27, 2024 · On the nature of the cross examination permitted under Section 138 of the Evidence Act, the learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4, 7 to 10 relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat, (2001) 3 SCC 1, Judgment and order dated 13.1.2024 passed by this Court in the case … easyesp